Skip to main content

Origin of Man Pushed Back 200,000 years - Not Africa

   News: Modern Homo sapiens did not come from the land of the Afri. Australia was the home for Mankind |origin of man - not africa. ▶ | human articles stories news tackle paragraph habiliments collections ornaments apparatus articles up stories on news equipage teams fashion kit fixtures material furnishings trappings articles at stories it news furniture sets outfit gadgets writing things gadget attachment articles as stories in news machinery contraptions read vestiges utensils kaboodle provisioning articles an stories pad baggage fittings provisions tools article words array ear articles accompaniments impediments setup appliances shebang facilities accessories Attacnts display contrivances and belongings stock stuff traps devices taking rig appurtenances listen things| in man of |◀ |
Australian Aboriginal
Progenitor?
We were taught that anthropologists knew it all, and everything they held about human evolution was correct. Human lineage could be placed on a timeline This is now proved to be incorrect: Papuans came out of Africa much earlier than the 50,000 to 80,000 years assumption. These people left the continent of Eden at least 100,000 yrs ago. The Original African theory supposed an Eve living as far back as 200,000. | ▶ not. |◀ |
African man
Adam?
Professor Alan Wilson has put forward the hypothesis that Australia could be the fountain place of Man. Aboriginals have the highest rate of genetic mutation of any "race". Mitochondrial evidence along the female line proves this. A colleague of Alan Wilson, Rebecca Cann, suggests the combining of two human lineages in Aborigines pushing modern Man back 400,000 yrs. | ▶ | man not | ▶ |    

There is another big mystery: humans have always lived alongside dogs. The presumption is that Aficans travelled all the way to the Indonesian Archipelago with dogs, but did not take them to Australia - very odd indeed. The British brought dogs in the eighteenth century. Dingoes escaped from Southeast Asian fishermen only a few centuries earlier. The Asian dog is a dingo. | ▶ | not. | ▶ |   | ▶ | not | ◀ |
◆Anthropology 
| not. |
 
 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LEAVING HOME
| ▶ | africa me you although I alas that ourselves nobody another some long gadzooks whatever congratulations others since duh currency who lie grief in little yourself itself once theirs arg supposing after we her eureka whiz than cheers few eek one wherever those nothing themselves dang either not aw no golly such his hers unless till them these yours eh ahem Each whichever encore if both bam where ours they more ahoy anyone as when herself bingo another one now it whereas us whom enough somebody neither whom bravo how hour fiddlesticks rather whomever each an whichever money. soon before gee he goodness because goodbye Anything everyone provided while who several drat gosh all aha brrr blah this him though something many whomever she himself which them darn anybody until whose other ahh someone why boo even whoever good origin mine what myself most none lest pushed everybody any inasmuch much whenever . | ◀ | world origin years pushed|

Popular posts from this blog

Consuming More Tea and Coffee Prevents Diabetes - Doubtful

Claims about consuming certain things to improve health are way off beam. Every now and then supposed new research shows that if you eat this or don't eat that your health will improve. Years late we discover that the "experts' were totally wrong and your health was actually damaged. This happened with margarine, milk, eggs and so on. What is the latest? Well, apparently drinking up to three cups of coffee or tea each day reduces the risk of getting diabetes. Look around. Do you see people who drink these beverages regularly with diabetes? You sure do. There are thousands of them. The University of Sydney says “If such beneficial effects were observed in interventional trials to be real, the implications for the millions of individuals who have diabetes mellitus, or who are at future risk of developing it, would be substantial.” Their trials must be wrong. Surely millions of regular drinkers who have diabetes are thinking, "Why me? Why have I got the disease&qu

Anthropology Has New Theory on Australian Aboriginals

New theory on Australian Aboriginals - Anthropology. Australian Aboriginals split from Eurasians and moved south into the dry continent. Twenty thousand years later the world warmed up and Australia was cut off from its northern neighbors. This is the latest theory.  But when Europeans initially came to Queensland there were two types of native people. Each was a distinct genetic pool. One was like Papua New Guineans. The other was very slight and shorter. It is the latter that predominates today. Papua New Guineans Australian Aboriginals Some scientists still hold that there was only one move out of Africa. This is an unsustainable supposition. The doors for movement were always open. Australian Aboriginals were quite unique. It seems that they were the first to leave Africa. There is also the question of Tasmanian Aboriginals who were wiped out by arriving Europeans. There is no evidence of them now. They could not light fires. The flames had to be stolen f

Happy Cow

"Yes, I am content." ✿ Funny Animal Photos contented cow field Adventure Australia Funny Weird Things Articles News Reviews ● ⌘   Vista Computer Solutions Blog   ⌘ ✤ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   . . . . . . . . . . cow content happy good life free field paddock green grass milk dairy COW NOT LEAVING HOME