Skip to main content

Anthropology Was Wrong About Races

    ▶ A race is not real. Those in a particular pool genetically are alike. stories and news anthropology wrong races array machinery baggage sets devices outfit tools taking vestiges anthropology gadget Attachments listen fixtures contrivances facilities material anthropology at appurtenances kit words kaboodle belongings furnishings apparatus anthropology as in trappings habiliments rig display article shebang attachment anthropology as wrong to races ornaments utensils fittings stock pad setup stuff accompaniments anthropology an wrong to races gadgets contraptions happening things tackle accessories teams furniture writing provisions fashion and appliances collections read equipage ear impediments things traps provisioning paragraph | news stories |◀ |
Anthropologist Johann Friedrich Blumenback promulated a concept that changed the way members of societies thought about the structure of Mankind for generations. Unfortunately, the belief was absolutely wrong. There are no races. Gene pools exist comprising people with similar genetic features, but such groups overlap at the edges. | ▶ not stories news. |◀ |
Races
Much suffering has been caused by imperial governments applying the theory across the world. It was the substantive driving force in colonialism. Slavery was condoned because of the premise. Even genocide was be carried out because of it. The level of intelligence is about the same for all humanity. Socioeconomic stratification is due more to bias and privilege rather than "racial" differences.  | ▶ | australian| ▶ |    

Even today, however, writers still divide humans into races in prose. There seems to be no other way to get an idea across than to separate populations into assumed uniform groupings. This is why it persists. Reality does not stop the human beings from continuing to use something that is absolutely erroneous. | ▶ | not. | ▶        | ▶ | not | ◀ |
◆ Anthropology 
Tys Outback
 
 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BELIEVING IS NOT THE TRUTH
| ▶ races | neither inasmuch rather how in her she money. as cheers dang grief each gosh even you others none it myself those Each drat both whichever many now brrr everybody goodness nobody who enough eh ours not when everyone good no we us bam someone most till I before although all after few whoever. yourself gee them fiddlesticks one such encore why what something goodbye though hour boo whiz his themselves that herself some lie whenever arg wherever whomever eek much because any until me this lest little ahoy which since whomever while more another supposing an once theirs aw somebody bingo anyone unless himself whatever ourselves alas darn eureka pushed ahh anybody long another nothing soon whose whichever than whereas either these whom aha currency origin one itself where hers whom several ahem they other mine golly congratulations who him he if them provided blah Anything gadzooks yours bravo | wrong ◀ | photos articles |

Popular posts from this blog

Consuming More Tea and Coffee Prevents Diabetes - Doubtful

Claims about consuming certain things to improve health are way off beam. Every now and then supposed new research shows that if you eat this or don't eat that your health will improve. Years late we discover that the "experts' were totally wrong and your health was actually damaged. This happened with margarine, milk, eggs and so on. What is the latest? Well, apparently drinking up to three cups of coffee or tea each day reduces the risk of getting diabetes. Look around. Do you see people who drink these beverages regularly with diabetes? You sure do. There are thousands of them. The University of Sydney says “If such beneficial effects were observed in interventional trials to be real, the implications for the millions of individuals who have diabetes mellitus, or who are at future risk of developing it, would be substantial.” Their trials must be wrong. Surely millions of regular drinkers who have diabetes are thinking, "Why me? Why have I got the disease&qu

Anthropology Has New Theory on Australian Aboriginals

New theory on Australian Aboriginals - Anthropology. Australian Aboriginals split from Eurasians and moved south into the dry continent. Twenty thousand years later the world warmed up and Australia was cut off from its northern neighbors. This is the latest theory.  But when Europeans initially came to Queensland there were two types of native people. Each was a distinct genetic pool. One was like Papua New Guineans. The other was very slight and shorter. It is the latter that predominates today. Papua New Guineans Australian Aboriginals Some scientists still hold that there was only one move out of Africa. This is an unsustainable supposition. The doors for movement were always open. Australian Aboriginals were quite unique. It seems that they were the first to leave Africa. There is also the question of Tasmanian Aboriginals who were wiped out by arriving Europeans. There is no evidence of them now. They could not light fires. The flames had to be stolen f

Happy Cow

"Yes, I am content." ✿ Funny Animal Photos contented cow field Adventure Australia Funny Weird Things Articles News Reviews ● ⌘   Vista Computer Solutions Blog   ⌘ ✤ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   . . . . . . . . . . cow content happy good life free field paddock green grass milk dairy COW NOT LEAVING HOME