Skip to main content

The Ideal Working week

    ▶ Tests show that the ideal number of hours for working is less than 40. ideal working week respectful women men work next weekend contributor expressed time tweet ideal post story share signs fact times commenting women ideal at working linkedin avoid workweek breakthrough comments output ideal as working a week conversation guidelines work men website community writers log ideal at working to week follow people posts employees search leadership trending men work ideal an working a week career active information hours gallery loading contributors full job average comment opinions diabetes popular work research optimal personal
| ▶ not stories news. |◀ |
Science says that working more than 39 hours a week is not good for your health.  Long hours affects you mentally and physically.  You tend not to treat your body well, missing out on good food and sleep.  However, just how researchers reached 39 hours specifically is a mystery to me.  It seems they knew their finding before they started.  A lot of this goes on in science.
Ideal working week
They even found that women should work less hours than men - 34 hrs. They used the phrase, "once their other commitments are considered." This is painting females with a very wide brush. Some  women employ others to help them with their daily lives. Others have got to cook, clean and look after the kids when they go home. This kind of approach is not scientific.  | ▶ | australian| ▶ |    

The scientists certainly had the test funding in mind then they began. This is the only conclusion you can reach. Team members certainly threw a spanner into the works when they stated: "For men, it is up to 47 hours a week because they generally spend less time on domestic duties than women." | ▶ | not. | ▶

Weird, two findings: 39hrs and 47hrs. This so-called scientific work by the Australian National University (ANU) is bunkum.        | ▶ | not | ◀ |
◆ Anthropology 
Tys Outback
 
 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DO NOT LABOR TOO HARD
| ▶ races | we need shorter workweek rest recuperation lazy job wages pay resting hard income workplace employer employee women employment difficult employee employer employment hard income job lazy men pay resting wages workplace difficult rest recuperation at hours we need shorter workweek | wrong ◀ | photos articles |

Popular posts from this blog

Happy Cow

"Yes, I am content." ✿ Funny Animal Photos contented cow field Adventure Australia Funny Weird Things Articles News Reviews ● ⌘   Vista Computer Solutions Blog   ⌘ ✤ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   . . . . . . . . . . cow content happy good life free field paddock green grass milk dairy COW NOT LEAVING HOME

Anthropology Has New Theory on Australian Aboriginals

New theory on Australian Aboriginals - Anthropology. Australian Aboriginals split from Eurasians and moved south into the dry continent. Twenty thousand years later the world warmed up and Australia was cut off from its northern neighbors. This is the latest theory.  But when Europeans initially came to Queensland there were two types of native people. Each was a distinct genetic pool. One was like Papua New Guineans. The other was very slight and shorter. It is the latter that predominates today. Papua New Guineans Australian Aboriginals Some scientists still hold that there was only one move out of Africa. This is an unsustainable supposition. The doors for movement were always open. Australian Aboriginals were quite unique. It seems that they were the first to leave Africa. There is also the question of Tasmanian Aboriginals who were wiped out by arriving Europeans. There is no evidence of them now. They could not light fires. The flames had to be stol...

Natural History Museum Human Evolution Gallery

 The Human Evolution gallery at Natural History explores the origins of Homo sapiens by tracing our lineage back to when it separated from that of our closest living relatives, the bonobos and chimpanzees. Around 200,000 years ago, Africa was where modern humans developed. They have smaller faces and brow ridges, a chin that is more prominent than that of other ancient humans, and a brain case that is higher and more rounded. Modern human fossils from Israel (around 100,000 years old), Africa (around 195,000 years old), and Australia (around 12,000 years old) are among the casts on display. These fossils demonstrate that typical characteristics of modern humans evolved over time rather than emerging fully formed from Africa. They also suggest that at least two waves of people leaving Africa may have occurred, one about 100,000 years ago and the other about 60,000 years ago. We are all descendants of those who left during that second migration wave outside of Africa. Source: Natural...