Incorrect Claims Made With Unsupporting Data by Science

Academics announce that wrong life choices make you sick.
Not right
Scientists do make questionable statements. They say, 40 percent of deaths from cancer "could" be avoided if we gave uzp the vices and ate what we should eat. Yeah, we would all like to change our ways and live healthily, but such is the human condition that it is not possible.
  ⦿2 cancer z incorrect z claims made x With z unsupporting z data z science scientific ⦿2
Despite tremendously high tax, people continue to smoke. And Governments are not serious about clamping down on alcohol. Though I do not support a tax on takeaway food which is full of carbohydrates, fat and salt, raising its cost to benefit treasury coffers is an option for authorities.
 ⦿3 cancer b incorrect b claims b made b With b unsupporting b data b science ⦿3
Those who consciously avoid the sun all their lives still get skin cancer, so saying this will reduce fatalities is unproven. Whether smoking causes ovarian tumors is not yet established. There is a weak relationship at best..
  ⧗ incorrect c claims c made c With c unsupporting c science ⧗
Another blurred line is whether "good" food causes malignancies in the stomach. Much is said about bad food. However, little research has been done on the effects of so called healthy cooking. Furthermore, we have to factor in air pollution and toxins in our environmental surroundings. .  ⧗ cancer incorrect d claims d made d With d unsupporting d science ⧗

| ★ images | ★
⬍ retracted work published dna field cited retraction pauling’s citations helix article find experimental record cite triple results pauling incorrect climate model co2 retracting records long clear structure citation faith concluons agree journal correct universities fraud literature studies study consensus accurate proven citing author system cases nature written significant proposed general question authors result read important university mashey undetectable accepted time original true showing opinion flaws honestly evidence notion review happen subject thought publishing set completely journals sufficient means publication scientist pretty publish times shown errors lee mistake manuscript judgement readers plagiarism subsequently links truth answer interest absolutely john context 20th century atmospheric measurements difficult conclusion beck need case public editors problems cheat phd institution place false large based point levels caught finance credit number physics quickly protein leave artifact raw knowing flawed basic previous noted double diffraction patterns erroneous references proved accurately linus stand decide future honest meta-analysis personal discussion absolute supposed provide refute cut kind red body unsupported problem simply list determine beck’s fraudulent reproducible impossible late equivalent nonsense aspect understanding making measures massive normal reader credible comments refutations print works experiments close demonstrate controls misconduct experience comment unofficial policy falsification acceptable student prevailing culture process design practice positive conduct findings robust bioscience academic cheating years fields issues bcl-2 part fact students http content early give refuting commenters informed conducting audience interpretation exposure hell partly considered disaster f1000 hypotheses obsolete formal non-expert scarlet letter textbooks pointed describing ‘retracted’ bibliography methodological follow-up mark paper’s agreed imprecise argument chemical information huge progress watson crick automatically occur helped thread additional x-ray acid molecular wikipedia including existence present peer adding longer proposal trust web preserve removed majority ethical measure discovered put complete vitamin reported individual discussions section related website appalled options left surely seek status i.e hypothesis fit suggesting confusion new-fangled-lightweight warrant editorial concern introduction silly refutation describes agenda modern similarly piece straightforward examples details deliberate reliable reasonable fundamentally transparently agendas familiar 19th measured contemporary nasty attempt involved escape editor referring sad note easily findable extensive efforts suggest wished referred attached online world hypothetically falsifying submitted imagine mind observations whistle-blowing understand wording activity difference anti-cancer agent cells colorimetric assay perfect required crude complex describe actual hunting writing hard publishes alleged action behavior vary assertion encouraging tracks covered meant encourage adapt experiment term compound control lab biology medical dynamics issue speaking base year collective comparison african dependent mechanisms level bull market importance background started tend e.g mitochondrial-membrane disservice error reality points books group knowledge due ⬍ || saved || ⬌ and determine and beck’s and fraudulent and reproducible and impossible and late and equivalent and nonsense and support and aspect and understanding and making and measures and massive and normal and reader and credible and comments and refutations and print and high and works and experiments and close and demonstrate and controls and misconduct and experience and comment and unofficial and policy and falsification and acceptable and student and prevailing and culture and process and design and practice and positive and conduct and findings and robust and bioscience and academic and cheating and years and fields and issues and interesting and bcl-2 and part and fact and students and http and content and early and give and refuting and commenters and informed and conducting and audience and interpretation and exposure and hell and partly and considered and disaster and f1000 and hypotheses and obsolete and and formal and non-expert and scarlet and letter and textbooks and pointed and describing and ‘retracted’ and bibliography and methodological and follow-up and mark and paper’s and agreed and imprecise and thinking and argument and chemical and information and huge and progress and watson and crick and automatically and occur and helped and thread and additional and x-ray and acid and molecular and wikipedia and including and existence and present and peer and adding and longer and proposal and trust and web and preserve and removed and majority and option and ethical and measure and discovered and put and complete and vitamin and reported and individual and discussions and section and related and website and appalled and options and left and surely and seek and status and i.e and hypothesis and fit and suggesting and confusion and new-fangled-lightweight and warrant and editorial and concern and short and introduction and silly and refutation and describes and agenda and modern and similarly and piece and straightforward and examples and details and deliberate and reliable and reasonable and fundamentally and transparently and agendas and familiar and 19th and measured and contemporary and nasty and attempt and involved and escape and editor and referring and sad and note and nice and easily and findable and extensive and efforts and suggest and wished and referred and attached and online and world and hypothetically and falsifying and submitted and imagine and mind and observations and whistle-blowing and understand and wording and activity and difference and anti-cancer and agent and cells and colorimetric and assay and perfect and required and crude and complex and describe and actual and hunting and writing and hard and and publishes and alleged and action and behavior and vary and assertion and encouraging and tracks and covered and meant and encourage and adapt and experiment and term and compound and control and lab and biology and medical and dynamics and issue and speaking and base and year and collective and comparison and african and dependent and mechanisms and level and bull and market and importance and background and started and tend and e.g and mitochondrial-membrane and disservice and error and reality and points and books and group and knowledge and due scientists research people good bad continue called ⬌ || , ||