Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence Algorithms are Biased in Decision Making

Algorithms make determinations based on concepts favored by programmers. They are not aware that they are doing it. This intelligence is truly artificial. k intelligence l artificial
Algorithms may seem to be good because they are the basis for AI. Anything that helps us must alright. This is a big mistake. Making choices is their main function and biases are set by their human creators. Decisions can benefit some while hurting others. 
⎳ a decision a artificial a intelligence a algorithms a biased a making biased ⎳

Mistakes by algorithms

Something that makes a critical choice must by definition be biased. Coders have to define the factors leading to a decision. Bias is clearly defined in mathematics as errors. Over or under representing populations in a sample is faulty. 
 ⦿3 b decision b artificial b intelligence b algorithms b biased b making ⦿3
Allocative harm involves discarding relevant resources in the evaluation process. Giving advice to a specialized target can end up with the subject being told to do something rationally wrong. Denying recommendations to others creates a distortion of reality.
 ⧗ c decision c artificial c intelligence c algorithms c making ⧗
Representative harm occurs when some groups are incorrectly labelled. Humans follow mistaken stereotypes which they pass on to AI software. Black people are not primitive humans. They are the major gene pool from which all the "races" on Earth developed. Google Photos identified them as gorillas.
⬍ public systems machine transparency learning schaake automated next wagner rights news online it's code report read wired neural networks companies values work algorithm power need facebook's needed government challenges information difficult complex diagnosis issue organisations  accountable ananny added social sector politician publicly video day car vehicle marietje mep affect decision-making oversight rule highest problem fake platforms ability highlighted isn't increasingly agrees office algorithmic ben ways levels science professor means understand created provide wallace impact life data accountability centre partnership facebook processes founder aims technology fund tech internet mit media technical research firms ensure interest ethical forces explained area private long-term consequences un-transparent unaccountable ⬍ || || ⬌ unaccountable un-transparent consequences long-term private area explained forces ethical interest ensure firms research technical media mit internet tech fund technology aims founder processes facebook partnership centre accountability data life impact wallace provide created understand means professor science levels ways ben algorithmic office agrees increasingly isn't highlighted ability platforms fake problem highest rule oversight decision-making affect mep marietje vehicle car moral day video publicly politician sector social added ananny accountable organisations issue diagnosis complex difficult information challenges government needed facebook's need power algorithm work values companies networks neural wired read report code it's online news rights wagner next automated schaake learning transparency machine systems public human decisions ⬌ || people set bias || data, information, advise, tell, plan, processes, intermediary, robot, workplace, street, ||
◆ HEALTH 
| ★ images | ★

Popular posts from this blog

Happy Cow

"Yes, I am content." ✿ Funny Animal Photos contented cow field Adventure Australia Funny Weird Things Articles News Reviews ● ⌘   Vista Computer Solutions Blog   ⌘ ✤ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   . . . . . . . . . . cow content happy good life free field paddock green grass milk dairy COW NOT LEAVING HOME

Anthropology Has New Theory on Australian Aboriginals

New theory on Australian Aboriginals - Anthropology. Australian Aboriginals split from Eurasians and moved south into the dry continent. Twenty thousand years later the world warmed up and Australia was cut off from its northern neighbors. This is the latest theory.  But when Europeans initially came to Queensland there were two types of native people. Each was a distinct genetic pool. One was like Papua New Guineans. The other was very slight and shorter. It is the latter that predominates today. Papua New Guineans Australian Aboriginals Some scientists still hold that there was only one move out of Africa. This is an unsustainable supposition. The doors for movement were always open. Australian Aboriginals were quite unique. It seems that they were the first to leave Africa. There is also the question of Tasmanian Aboriginals who were wiped out by arriving Europeans. There is no evidence of them now. They could not light fires. The flames had to be stol...

Natural History Museum Human Evolution Gallery

 The Human Evolution gallery at Natural History explores the origins of Homo sapiens by tracing our lineage back to when it separated from that of our closest living relatives, the bonobos and chimpanzees. Around 200,000 years ago, Africa was where modern humans developed. They have smaller faces and brow ridges, a chin that is more prominent than that of other ancient humans, and a brain case that is higher and more rounded. Modern human fossils from Israel (around 100,000 years old), Africa (around 195,000 years old), and Australia (around 12,000 years old) are among the casts on display. These fossils demonstrate that typical characteristics of modern humans evolved over time rather than emerging fully formed from Africa. They also suggest that at least two waves of people leaving Africa may have occurred, one about 100,000 years ago and the other about 60,000 years ago. We are all descendants of those who left during that second migration wave outside of Africa. Source: Natural...