Skip to main content

Australian Government Fails To Introduce an Obesity Program

Australia is one of the fattest countries on the planet. Now, 60 percent of people are overweight. By 2025 it will increase to four out of five Aussies. The government does not care. There is no federally funded organized program to combat this.

Fat Australians
The closest the government has come is the Health Star rating system on product labeling and the Food Partnership to inform about healthy eating. There are problem with these strategies: Pepsico, Coca-Cola, Kelloggs and Nestle helped set the policies.

Groups pushing for action said that the food industry should not be on the committee: consumption goods producers should be directed to change according to rational directives. Health Star is not mandatory: this was decided by big company muscle.

What many want is a sugar tax. Obviously, sugary product manufacturers do not want this. They already donate millions to lobby their case with political parties. The Beverage Council is the major lobbyist against a tax on sugar.

While parties are happy not to instigate a sugar tax, most Australians support a charge on sugar-sweetened drinks. There is an issue on how far the burden will be spread when it is ultimately introduced. Will it extend to bread which is a fattening carbohydrate?

+
say xxxxxx or government he fails let introduce gov by obesity of program on politics if + $ aye xx stay xxx was fails hi introduce not obesity pad program at politics an $ % of xxxx ran xxxxx ho fails in introduce at obesity on program or politics at % ~ do xxxxxxx pay government to fails ah introduce so obesity do program up politics| blog | tax sugar | ~ * hi advertising bo report ja evidence oo unhealthy ur junk op scheme na sacks on foods ar children ky university ki it's go council ma shows ah policies uh taxes ea bit xi countries es researchers zo rating oe events it deakin od needed pe clear as gary he address id industry ed cost ad lot os dawson in putting ow restrictions gi time ti drinks si organisations om public mu radio ay cent hm australia's ye changing ee world we raised ne ban ae beverage io restricting ko directed am recommend fa stars go sponsorship * = advertising report evidence unhealthy junk scheme sacks foods children international university it's council shows policies taxes bit countries researchers rating events deakin needed clear gary address industry cost lot dawson putting restrictions time drinks organisations public radio cent australia's changing world raised ban beverage restricting directed recommend stars sponsorship = || healthy, healthlier, grub, dinner, lunch, eat, takeaway, macdonalds, kfc, sweeteners, || 
◆ Society 
| ★ images | ★

Popular posts from this blog

Happy Cow

"Yes, I am content." ✿ Funny Animal Photos contented cow field Adventure Australia Funny Weird Things Articles News Reviews ● ⌘   Vista Computer Solutions Blog   ⌘ ✤ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   . . . . . . . . . . cow content happy good life free field paddock green grass milk dairy COW NOT LEAVING HOME

Anthropology Has New Theory on Australian Aboriginals

New theory on Australian Aboriginals - Anthropology. Australian Aboriginals split from Eurasians and moved south into the dry continent. Twenty thousand years later the world warmed up and Australia was cut off from its northern neighbors. This is the latest theory.  But when Europeans initially came to Queensland there were two types of native people. Each was a distinct genetic pool. One was like Papua New Guineans. The other was very slight and shorter. It is the latter that predominates today. Papua New Guineans Australian Aboriginals Some scientists still hold that there was only one move out of Africa. This is an unsustainable supposition. The doors for movement were always open. Australian Aboriginals were quite unique. It seems that they were the first to leave Africa. There is also the question of Tasmanian Aboriginals who were wiped out by arriving Europeans. There is no evidence of them now. They could not light fires. The flames had to be stol...

Natural History Museum Human Evolution Gallery

 The Human Evolution gallery at Natural History explores the origins of Homo sapiens by tracing our lineage back to when it separated from that of our closest living relatives, the bonobos and chimpanzees. Around 200,000 years ago, Africa was where modern humans developed. They have smaller faces and brow ridges, a chin that is more prominent than that of other ancient humans, and a brain case that is higher and more rounded. Modern human fossils from Israel (around 100,000 years old), Africa (around 195,000 years old), and Australia (around 12,000 years old) are among the casts on display. These fossils demonstrate that typical characteristics of modern humans evolved over time rather than emerging fully formed from Africa. They also suggest that at least two waves of people leaving Africa may have occurred, one about 100,000 years ago and the other about 60,000 years ago. We are all descendants of those who left during that second migration wave outside of Africa. Source: Natural...